Saturday, October 21, 2017

To Succeed You Need to Risk Everything and be Stubborn - NOT! (ENT 630-1)

Chapter 2 of It's a Jungle in There demonstrates the humor value of the book and explains the book's title. It also provides evidence of why the book offers poor and simplistic advice for the entrepreneur.

The author presents a story in which he intends to demonstrate to venture capitalists the idea of a restaurant with a jungle theme. His tactic is to convert his house into a jungle.  He proposes this as an example of why the entrepreneur must have sufficient passion and take necessary risks to succeed.

His strategy is a classic "throw in all the chips" type of gambling based risk-taking. One puts all one's effort into one potential solution and risks everything. Further, it demonstrates little planning regarding the overall business with the only emphasis focused on highlighting the desire to create something new based pm an inspiration. Overall, it is not surprising that the potential funder was dubious despite the fact that his family and friends thought the house was impressive. A house lit up for the holidays is similarly impressive, yet no sound investor would see such a home as evidence of a potential investment in a holiday-themed enterprise (or hasn't yet).

In the process, the author mortgaged his house and spent $400,000 on alterations to switch it into a jungle.He spent several years trying to convince others that a restaurant was a good idea using his house as a demonstration. It appears that only one fish caught this bait and it took 2 years to real it in.

In the process, he did not pay his gas bill and engaged in illegal activities associated with stealing access to the resources of the gas company to keep his house warm (and his jungle viable). It's unclear how many other code violations he could be accused of in the alterations of his home. But it's likely that his use of electricity violated the electrical code. He angered others around him by turning a residential neighborhood into a demonstration of a concept. With the jungle alterations probably placed other houses near him at risk of fire and likely decreased their value. Most communities would have shut him down, causing him to lose the entire investment.

The money he used to alter his home was most certainly wasted and would not add value in the long-term. Also, all the alterations would need to be reversed yielding additional expense.

Further, many advisors do not recommend mortgaging one's house to obtain capital to engage in an entrepreneurial pursuit. There are several good reasons. In addition to the reality that if one loses, then one has lost a place to live, there is the more logical question if this is a good strategy. In fact, the additional stress of knowing that failure means losing a roof over one's head may cause someone to take less risk because the repercussions are so grave. In his case, such reckless behavior was not an issue as he apparently was going to accept any risk to achieve the goal obtaining the venture capitalist interest and achieve his passion. However, such reckless abandon is not typical behavior even for entrepreneurs.

The author presents his approach as the only solution in which he could have launched his entrepreneurial pursuit. He does not describe getting input from any other person before embarking on this extreme strategy. Had he asked for input (say a potential customer) a more efficient way to spend to $400,000 would be to set up a coffee shop with a jungle theme. Although the coffee shop might not have been quite as extensive as he proposed, it may have been sufficient to demonstrate the value of his concept. The coffee shop could have provided a potential revenue-generating example of his jungle themed restaurant. Customers could guide steady growth by asking about interest in decor changes, menu additions, meal preferences, and pricing. If successful, he might not have needed to seek venture capital funding to grow the coffee shop to a more extensive restaurant. Bootstrapping this process may have been a far more efficient and effective way of achieving his results without engaging in illegal and reckless behavior.

To summarize, Chapter 2 violates any good advice one might give an entrepreneur. Actually, perhaps it provides excellent advice - do the opposite!

Reference:
Schussler Steven, Karlins Marvin. It’s a Jungle in There: Inspiring Lessons, Hard-Won Insights, and Other Acts of Entrepreneurial Daring. Vol Reprint edition. New York: Sterling. February 7, 2012.

Photo CreditBengal tiger in jungle-1920x1080.jpg. Author Hineshvalayil. 7 June 2016. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

6 comments:

  1. Hi Brad! You will certainly be valuable in this course as the devil's advocate! While overall, I agree with your take on Schussler's approach, I have to say as a artist there is something rather inspiring in his reckless abandon! Perhaps because there have been so many black sheep in the world of art, there seems something recognizable in his daring and attention to details. Surely, this approach will not work for everyone, but there are certain personalities out there who may be challenged to do great things because of Schussler's insanity!
    JOY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I share your enthusiasm for people to break the barriers and open up new ideas and approaches. My main concern is the reckless disregard for everyone else. Hopefully, we can be Innovative and push the boundaries without pushing other people off the cliff at the same time.

      -- Brad

      Delete
  2. I adore that you disagree with Schussler's approach. His method certainly isn't for everyone and I respect that you view it as a lesson in what NOT to do. In addition to legal and code violations, I also imagine him getting sick from either the jungle animals living with him or the antifreeze creek running through his house. His vision was quite narrow in focus.--Nancy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find it interesting that some of his stunts were later shut down by others who spent more time thinking. We later hear that the tropical birds were removed from the restaurant after new owners took over. I resent the use of animals as decorative items. I'm entirely comfortable with a pet that one brings into one's home and treats as a family member. But animals are not given to us to serve as marketing tools.

      I am also a big fan of The Endangered Species Act. But one problem is that the public perceives that only beautiful animals are worthy of protection. We have to be careful to make sure that folks' compassion extends beyond brightly colored birds.

      -- Brad

      Delete
  3. I agree that he could've scaled down on the house theme and really did more of his research to expand the house in a way that would go towards what the market wanted. I will say I agree with majority of his thoughts especially on passion and dreaming. Great article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. David,

      I totally agree on passion and dreaming. Perhaps that didn't come through. My point is you don't have to go to such a crazy extreme or place others or your personal health at risk. An entrepreneur definitely needs passion and a vision that others don't see.

      Delete